- From: Lukasz Anforowicz <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:12:21 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 17:12:46 UTC
@evilpie, we have some data in the "[Quantifying CORB impact on existing websites](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/services/network/cross_origin_read_blocking_explainer.md#Quantifying-CORB-impact-on-existing-websites)" section of the explainer. After excluding responses that had an explicit "Content-Length: 0" response header, we see that 0.115% of all CORB-eligible responses might have been observably blocked due to a nosniff header or range request. The real question here is: how many of these 0.115% contained images (and were undesirably disrupted by CORB) VS non-images (and were non-decodable with and without CORB). At this point we only have anecdotal data - we were able to only repro one such case in the wild and it turned out to be a tracking pixel that returned a html doc as a response. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/681#issuecomment-378675724
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 17:12:46 UTC