- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:08:19 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2018 08:10:49 UTC
@benjamingr The lack of backpressure is a deficiency in Chrome's implementation. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=535793. In general, if you need to _add_ buffering, piping through a `new TransformStream(undefined, new ByteLengthQueuingStrategy({highWaterMark: 16 * 1024 * 1024}))` is the way to go. _Removing_ buffering would be somewhere between "hard to implement" and "infeasible". There are multiple layers of buffering in place, all of which serve a purpose and some of which are outside of the control of the browser implementer. It might be possible to have a "hint" to implementations that a particular fetch wants reduced buffering, but I expect it would end up with all implementations ignoring the hint completely. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/689#issuecomment-378165013
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2018 08:10:49 UTC