- From: Anssi Kostiainen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 01:09:16 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/207@github.com>
Dear TAG! We're requesting a TAG review of: - Name: Generic Sensor API - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/sensors/ And the following concrete sensors that [extend](https://w3c.github.io/sensors/#extensibility) the Generic Sensor API: - Name: Ambient Light Sensor - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/ambient-light/ - Name: Accelerometer - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/accelerometer/ - Name: Gyroscope - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/gyroscope/ - Name: Magnetometer - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/magnetometer/ - Name: Orientation Sensor - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/orientation-sensor/ Further resources: - Use cases: https://w3c.github.io/sensors/usecases - Explainer: https://w3c.github.io/motion-sensors/ - Demos: https://intel.github.io/generic-sensor-demos/ - Developer docs: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/sensors-for-the-web - Tests: [generic-sensor](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/generic-sensor) [ambient-light](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/ambient-light) [accelerometer](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/accelerometer) [gyroscope](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/gyroscope) [magnetometer](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/magnetometer) [orientation-sensor](https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/orientation-sensor) - Primary contacts: @rwaldron @alexshalamov @pozdnyakov Further details (optional): - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: we plan to advance to CR around 1Q'18 assuming positive feedback from the origin trial and you! Feedback from TAG by the end of 2017 would be nice. - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The [assessment is here](https://github.com/w3c/sensors/blob/master/security-questionnaire.md). - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) You should also know that... - We have prepared a [Changelog](https://github.com/w3c/sensors/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) documenting the differences from the [W3C Working Draft 24 March 2016](https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-generic-sensor-20160324/) TAG reviewed earlier to make this revisit a pleasant experience for you. - We have addressed all your feedback provided during the earlier review in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/110 and https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/115 - Generic Sensor-based sensors in scope for this TAG review are available as an [origin trial](https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/sensors-for-the-web) starting in Chrome 63. We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [ ] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback - [ ] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review - [x] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/207
Received on Friday, 20 October 2017 08:09:40 UTC