- From: Janne Koschinski <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 08:56:43 UTC
This issue complains that the WHATWG pushes a URL definition that only represents a tiny amount of stakeholders as canonical. No adoption has happened, even by the stakeholders taking part in the issue, since. As result, maybe the WHATWG should reopen this, and re-evaluate if promoting this definition as the canonical definition of "URL" is a good idea, or if this standard should be dropped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-337844034
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 08:56:43 UTC