- From: Joe Pea <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:54:39 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 13 October 2017 17:55:03 UTC
> it's a fault of the caller. Maybe, but easily avoidable by the engine. Is the reasoning to avoid implementation complexity? Or something else? The only thing I can imagine is using the act of setting attributes as method calls (sort of like how jQuery uses strings for method calls). ```js elm.setAttribute('doSomething', 'arg') // ... elm.setAttribute('doSomething', 'arg') // do it again later ``` but the custom element can also just provide an actual method. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/676#issuecomment-336523715
Received on Friday, 13 October 2017 17:55:03 UTC