Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) from Hiroki Nakagawa on 2017-10-10 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2017)

From: Hiroki Nakagawa <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:20:51 -0700
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/527/c335488567@github.com>

> I think the best course of action is for worklets to be subresources, though it wold be good for @mikewest to chime in to say if that would harm CSP in anyway.

How about dedicated workers? Should we change them to subresources, too?

Note that, in the current Chromium implementation, dedicated workers don't have their own service worker. They are controlled by parent document's service worker (https://crbug.com/731599). AFAICS, Firefox does the same behavior, so it could relatively be easy to change them to subresources in terms of SW interception.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/527#issuecomment-335488567

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 14:21:54 UTC