Re: [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432)

Couple ideas:
1. A simple global ordering could be lexicographical with the key being the contents of each of the fragments that end up being combined into one. It's definitely not great and if we organize specifications differently there might be some observable side effects.
2. Another thing we could do is require random order between fragments, but specified order for a given fragment. That complicates testing and implementation more than the former strategy I think.
3. We could continue to not care and hope the problem doesn't spread.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/432#issuecomment-334373915