Re: [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432)

> Well, can't we leave inter-IDL fragment order undefined/implementation-defined?

I don't really have a strong opinion on this outside of the fact that I'd like to be able to resolve the contraction in the spec plus spec mixin order.

> Like isn't relative order within the IDL fragment all we really care about in real life?

For testing JSON order, that's sort of painful, but maybe nobody really cares about JSON order.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/432#issuecomment-334259952