Re: [whatwg/streams] Add an extension point for byte transform streams (#820)

I think having `type` alongside `readableType` and `writableType` would be confusing. Asymmetrical transform streams appear to be useful, with TextEncoder being the canonical example. In which case, we need `readableType: 'bytes'` which would mean not having `type`. We need more experience with byte streams before we can be certain.

Since we don't know what is needed yet, maybe we should just leave no extension points at all? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/820#issuecomment-333870591