- From: dfabulich <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 18:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 1 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC
I'm also new to the process. I think `<shadowroot>` makes sense when attaching the shadow DOM directly to the `<shadowroot>`'s parent element. But I find @sebmarkbage's `<template attachto>` suggestion quite interesting and strictly more powerful. Especially if, as @slightlyoff points out, it would require "extraordinary lift" to define and implement `<shadowroot>`, well, so much the worse for `<shadowroot>`. I'm also quite intrigued by @tjmonsi's suggestion to declaratively define custom elements and their shadow DOM with something like `<template tag="my-custom">`. That seems really nice in its own right, and would also provide 95% of the value of `<template attachto>`. (Just give the `attachto` element a custom tag name and use `<template tag>` instead.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/510#issuecomment-333396081
Received on Sunday, 1 October 2017 18:24:17 UTC