Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] adding IANA considerations section (#1154)

On 2017-05-29 12:54, Jungkee Song wrote:
> *@jungkees* commented on this pull request.
> +        <li>Header Field Name: Service-Worker</li>
> +        <li>Applicable Protocol: Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)</li>
> +        <li>Status: Standard</li>
> +        <li>Author/Change controller: W3C</li>
> +        <li>Specification document(s): https://www.w3.org/TR/service-workers-1/</li>
> Not sure which document it should point to. Service Workers 1 is a 
> snapshot of Service Workers which is a living document.

from the IETF point of view a stable document would be preferable. i 
guess in principle what's really required is a stable definition, and 
stable documents simply are a good proxy for that. is there any 
precedence in documents that are both W3C and WHATWG? maybe at least 
shoot for consistency...


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1154#issuecomment-304636026