- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 00:24:22 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 07:24:55 UTC
@jugglinmike, sorry I didn't recall my intention on the steps of this method reviewing back after a long time and reverted the patch. The update() method isn't actually supposed to go in parallel until the update job that it creates is scheduled by Run Job algorithm later. The issue that you posed in this PR should still be addressed. I'll do that by filing an issue and moving the guarding steps to appropriate places - maybe to the Update algorithm. (Need to check.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1152#issuecomment-304591598
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 07:24:55 UTC