- From: chaals <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 06:42:03 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 13:42:41 UTC
Some personal thoughts: Thanks all for the review… I'll ask Sangwhan about summary activation, although I also did a big chunk of work on that recently to bring it into line with reality - it wasn't, and the changes that WHATWG had made to their spec weren't either. With any luck, we can close that out. The current approach to rel values being in a wiki is hard to use. There are various specs that have included them, and a more pleasant registry would be great. I will propose to keep what we have for now, since it has been around for a while, and look to improve in the next year (HTML 5.3 timeframe). I think we cleaned up `style` to be conforming in `body` with a recent commit: https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/e0cf4c7d9a0e651b02af40f4700e1d257c83db6f We'll look into the other points… -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/119#issuecomment-304285451
Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 13:42:41 UTC