- From: Justin Novosad <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:08:32 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2017 20:10:02 UTC
@fserb: I think that in the cases where there are discrepancies between the implementation's IDL and what is actually supported, this can be simply handled in the implementation by overriding auto-generated supports() with a custom implementation of supports(). I think these cases would be quite rare (options only supported under specific conditions?). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-304110335
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2017 20:10:02 UTC