- From: Mike West <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 03:58:10 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2017 10:58:47 UTC
> Right, thanks. I guess I meant > > ```javascript > new WebSocket(`wss://example.com/foo\nbar>baz`); > ``` > > will fail. Again, is this desired behavior? I think so, yes. If we're going to block raw `\n` and `<` in one context, it makes sense to block them in all contexts. Otherwise we're just introducing confusing distinctions. > Are there tests for it, and other cases like it? I've added fetch tests to Chrome's tentative implementation of this behavior. Should be upstreamed shortly. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/284#issuecomment-303691004
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2017 10:58:47 UTC