Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider boolean interface for properties (#461)

> That should probably be a separate discussion though as it's quite a bit different from OP.

if you read 'till the end you'll see I've passed through `value` and boolean attributes too, ending up with `crossorigin` which is both boolean and meaningful.

I think at least the boolean part, should be compatible with whatever idea comes up, but since in this case an attribute can also have a value, a solution compatible with that case too maybe would be ideal?

As summary, properties used as boolean may also have a value, the OP mentioned interface could probably address these too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/461#issuecomment-303312670