Re: [whatwg/url] IDNA / UTS #46 "should" requirements (#110)

Hmm, maybe that's wrong. Safari definitely doesn't seem to do the same thing as Firefox for CONTEXTJ though per https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/208902/webkit it should? @achristensen07 any insights? I kinda thing we should allow CONTEXTJ if we allow emojis for subdomains. Banning a subset of emojis seems a little weird.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/110#issuecomment-302361875

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 10:12:41 UTC