Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

I agree with about 90% what @rniwa wrote. If i need a certain component for my current view, i dont want to show anything to the user until the component is loaded. And only in the case that the component failed to load, js is disabled or CEs arent even supported, i want to provide fallback content. __But__ this fallback content is just very simple content like an Image or Info message in the hugh majority of cases.
Whats the point of having reusable components when i reimplement it "the old way" anyway. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-302302464