- From: sleevi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 01:00:23 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:00:56 UTC
Token Binding's predecessors (Channel ID, Origin Bound Certs) is why Chrome originally introduced the pooling it did. Token Binding's design (to be at the H/2 Req/Response layer) was particularly trying to address some of these deficiencies and make it easier to reuse the same connection. We have not yet modeled the privacy and security properties of referred Token Binding into the credentialed access case to determine what reuse or separation is needed. Since TB tries to mimic a request-oriented auth flow, hopefully the properties are similar. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/30#issuecomment-301232746
Received on Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:00:56 UTC