- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:50:19 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 19:50:52 UTC
I think we explicitly decided against auto-generating such lists via the old IDL Array mechanism. I don't see why we shouldn't have _interfaces_ that opt into looking like a typed array: more or less API-compatible with Array, but without actually being an Array subclass, so there is control over writes into the array. You can get there right now with indexed getters/setters and some manual definition of various methods; the only question is whether we should have a built-in IDL shorthand for this sort of thing. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/345#issuecomment-300593367
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 19:50:52 UTC