- From: Dylan Barrell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 06:21:40 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 13:22:13 UTC
@rniwa how many examples do you want before you admit that your a priori opinion is possibly not correct? What is a valid argument in your opinion? Is the Vimium example not obviously a valid example of an application? What about that application makes you think it does not require access to the shadow DOM. Here is another example, albeit forward-looking: the Web standardization process has accepted polyfilling future functionality as a way to prove out the validity/value and appropriateness of a new extension. It is impossible to polyfill anything that would need access to all shadow DOMs if they are closed. This cannot be circumvented with user agent permissions. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/640#issuecomment-300479756
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 13:22:13 UTC