- From: Robert Bradford <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 11:55:24 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2017 18:55:56 UTC
@WebReflection, I wasn't intending to be tedious. I didn't/don't see the other posts you referenced and was only suggesting `<noscript>` be used for developers to explicitly provide the fallback for custom elements instead of the browser trying to determine a replacement. Sorry it didn't provide a solution to the other problem you mentioned. Hope you get it figured out. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-300267119
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2017 18:55:56 UTC