Re: [heycam/webidl] WIP: add localizable dictionary (#358)

> I'd rather not use extended attributes for this.

Noted.

> I guess we need to decide whether we want to support per-member localization like the i18n group suggests, or not, like @annevk suggests. That governs the shape of the solution.

Can't we somehow have both? E.g. have dictionary members whose `LocalizableString` is a DOMString take the values of the `lang` and `dir`  member of the dictionary:

```webidl
dictionary FooBar : Localizable {
  LocalizableString foo;
  LocalizableString bar;
};
```
For example:

```js
{ lang: "fr-CH", foo: { value: "hello", lang: "en-US" }, bar: "bonjour" };
```

where `bar` takes its `lang` value from the top-level `lang` attribute and `foo` from `foo.lang`.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/358#issuecomment-300105542