- From: Henri Sivonen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 08:58:07 -0700
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 15:58:39 UTC
This doesn't match Gecko and Blink for at least U+FF9F and U+FF9E. Those normalize to U+309A and U+3099 (at least according to the Unicode.org PDF code tables and Python's `unicodedata`), but neither of those is is JIS X 0208. The non-combining variants _are_ in JIS X 0208 and are used by Gecko and Blink: U+309C and U+309B. I'd prefer to have a new index for this stuff in the JSON file instead of relying on the definition of normalization by reference, when Python's impl at least doesn't yield the expected results. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/106#issuecomment-299504048
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 15:58:39 UTC