- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 23:20:30 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/164@github.com>
Hello TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of: - Name: ReadableStream pipeTo() and pipeThrough() - Specification URL: - https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#rs-pipe-to - https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#rs-pipe-through - Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: - This section contains a high-level overview: https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#pipe-chains - Some additional examples: https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#example-basic-pipe-to - A related FAQ: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/blob/master/FAQ.md#whats-with-pipeto-vs-pipethrough - Requirements document: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/blob/master/Requirements.md#composing-streams - Primary contacts: @domenic, @tyoshino, @ricea Further details (optional): - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: We are hoping to launch in Blink in M59, for which the branch point is in a couple weeks - [ ] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/): not really applicable here - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) You should also know that... This feature is closely related to writable streams, #163. We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [x] open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback - [ ] open a single issue in our Github repo for the entire review - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/164
Received on Friday, 31 March 2017 06:21:26 UTC