- From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:53:49 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 18:54:23 UTC
I don't believe this change should be necessary. WebIDL already takes care of more-or-less wrapping non-promise values in Promise.resolve() for methods that are defined as taking a Promise<T>. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1097#issuecomment-290509551
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 18:54:23 UTC