- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:19:11 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2017 09:19:45 UTC
> @wanderview do you have any particular concern (e.g. security) for this uncertainty of HTML Imports + Service Worker integration? No. It just caught my eye because I know we have had poor support for the "inherited service worker" case with <iframe srcdoc>. It got me wondering how html imports works in chrome and if that behavior matched what people would expect. If the answer to (1) is "yes", then I have a follow-on question: If `clients.claim()` starts controlling the master document, do the imported documents correctly start getting controlled as well? For example, if an imported document <script> does `setInterval(_ => fetch(url, 1000)` will those fetches start getting controlled when the master document is claimed in chrome? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1095#issuecomment-290032572
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2017 09:19:45 UTC