Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should clients.claim() control reserved Clients? (#1090)

Ah.. yes. The controlled clients are covered by skipWaiting()-Activate step7.1 as you pointed! Reserved clients should count. Please ignore the scenario that I was concerned about. Sorry for my confusion.

That clarified, `clients.claim()`'s main role is to cover the case where a client initially called the registration function and the case when a registration with more specific matching scope is registered. Coming back to OP, I'm not so sure, but for the latter case `clients.claim()` should take control of reserved clients?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1090#issuecomment-288654268