- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:16:54 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 06:17:26 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > Rethrow any exceptions. + <details class=note> + <summary>Why create a copy of the value?</summary> + The value must be serialized when stored. Treating it as a copy + here allows other algorithms in this specification to treat it as + an ECMAScript value, but implementations may optimize this + if the difference in behavior is not observable. + </details> This difference can be observable, especially with very large ArrayBuffer objects. With those the initial copy might succeed, but then a later serialization could fail in a naive implementation. That seems somewhat bad. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/171#pullrequestreview-28575587
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 06:17:26 UTC