Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider Client behavior for windows where initial about:blank is replaced with a loaded document (#1091)

>  I suspect perhaps the intent was not to mark the Client as non-reserved until after the final loaded document is execution ready.

Talking with @bzbarsky, it may be very hard to determine if an initial about:blank will indeed be followed up another document.  And I don't think we can just ignore about:blank completely because programmatically constructed iframes are supposed to inherit their parent's service worker controller, etc.  We need to represent them as Client objects.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1091#issuecomment-288601819