- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:54 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 07:01:27 UTC
> "yes, worker termination is a practical concern, so we do need to guard against it," but "no, we shouldn't do it with a postMessage-based "keep alive" protocol." Maybe those initial experiments with IndexedDB will come in handy, after all! Yes, that is what I thought. The keep alive protocol approach should be discouraged in practical use. So, if we introduce some helper function/testing strategy for that test pattern, one based on a persistent storage would be preferable in the first place IMO. Comments from other colleagues would be appreciated. Thanks for your contribution to service workers, @jugglinmike! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1087#issuecomment-286973870
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 07:01:27 UTC