- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:46:48 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 01:47:22 UTC
IMO, introducing a keep alive protocol across events seems not a good idea. It's against the original design decision that service workers are event-driven and short-running. User agents may also detect and terminate the execution anyway if they regard it an abnormal operation. I think "3) sending results to the page on each event" in https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=558244 is desirable. But if tests can't be designed in that way and need to span multiple `ServiceWorkerGlobalScope`s' creation/termination, using a storage would be a good direction I think. Can we think about adding some helper functions to make it easier to use a global storage instead of introducing a keep alive protocol? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1087#issuecomment-286616371
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 01:47:22 UTC