- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:29:50 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140/286275673@github.com>
I went through the comments above. Here are notes about the ones that are not currently resolved (where I'm counting what seems to me like an adequate response to one of @slightlyoff's or @travisleithead's comments as resolved): * https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/361 was filed to add an example with ES5 class syntax, but it's so far had negative reaction from @domenic * the issue of paintWorklet being on Window is covered by https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/350 (and https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/330) but hasn't yet been edited into the spec * I wonder if the spec should actually *mention* `border-image-outset` in a comment somewhere (as was mentioned in https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140#issuecomment-281580852) given that it seems likely to be a common question, although it's not an entirely satisfactory answer given the 9-slice mess you'd have to go through * https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/339 is not yet resolved * not sure if more discussion is needed on stability of canvas and its references * there doesn't seem to be an issue open covering the comments about filters in https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140#issuecomment-281580852 * conic gradient example still isn't edited in * I don't see an open issue representing the future work on CSSFontFaceValue mentioned in https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140#issuecomment-281580852 * https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/362 is still open * https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/326 is still open * https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/327 is still open -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140#issuecomment-286275673
Received on Monday, 13 March 2017 23:30:24 UTC