- From: Till Schneidereit <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:02:57 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 15:04:13 UTC
> Oh, and also, we use the same pattern for custom elements. Here was the thread with arguments for it at that time: w3c/webcomponents#417 That's a good discussion of the up- and downsides to this, thanks. I don't know if the same is true for custom elements, though I'd assume so, but as I said above the important part for me is that having this check be required would necessitate entering the JS engine in *some* fashion, even if it doesn't necessarily entail running JS code itself. (Though recommending developers freeze the object or make the `transform` property non-configurable would also work.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/691#issuecomment-285691016
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 15:04:13 UTC