- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:42:32 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 05:43:04 UTC
ricea commented on this pull request. > @@ -2693,10 +2693,16 @@ WritableStream(<var>underlyingSink</var> = {}, { <var>size</var>, <var>highWater behavior will be the same as a {{CountQueuingStrategy}} with a <a>high water mark</a> of 1. </div> +<div class="note"> + The \[[inFlightCloseRequest]] slot and \[[closeRequest]] slot are mutually exclusive. No element will be removed from + \[[writeRequests]] while \[[inFlightWriteRequest]] is not <code>undefined</code>. Implementations may optimize the way English nit: "Implementations may optimize storage for these slots" would sound more natural. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/672#pullrequestreview-25952268
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 05:43:04 UTC