- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:13:37 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 21:14:27 UTC
??? That doesn't match what you said above, where the conflict was about whether they should act like an array iterator (which'll just goes index-by-index, so it'll do weird things if you modify the array during iteration) vs a map/set iterator (which gets refs to the values ahead of time, so it won't change as you mutate). The question of "does `iterator<>` make you array-like or set-like" is a completely different issue, and one with an obvious answer: uh, array-like, because `setlike<>` is for set-likes. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/291#issuecomment-284861012
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 21:14:27 UTC