- From: Simon Pieters <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:15:15 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2017 08:15:49 UTC
Why do we want to enable them to do that in the future? It could make sense to use `<audio>` for video if one wants to only have the audio part of a video (and maybe show the browser-provided `controls`). I can't come up with a convincing use case right now though. It makes perfect sense to use `<video>` for audio if one wants to use a `poster` image or show captions. What effect would it have on caches if `<audio>` and `<video>` have different `Accept` and the same URL is used in both elements? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/437#issuecomment-283273835
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2017 08:15:49 UTC