Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645)

Unless I've misread, I think for @TakayoshiKochi 's first option, https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2791 could fill that gap, no? and we could leave imports for the more sophisticated dependency-tree-resolving use cases. 

I think includes or imports could use <template> as an inert wrapper for any arbitrary markup including scripts, and non-<template> markup should otherwise be treated as "live" in either the dumb inclusion scenario or the module resolution scenario.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/645#issuecomment-312129425