- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 18:46:58 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. Couple nits. I'll have more time to study the impact next week. The idea is that media APIs will set this flag? > @@ -4219,9 +4251,6 @@ objects.</span> "<code>response</code>" or "<code>none</code>". -<p class="note no-backref">"<code>immutable</code>" exists for service workers. -[[!SW]] Was this intentional? > @@ -4240,6 +4269,17 @@ objects.</span> "<code>request</code>" and <var>name</var> is a <a>forbidden header name</a>, return. + <li><p>Otherwise, if <a for=Headers>guard</a> is "<code>request-no-cors</code>" and Newline after `<li>` as it contains multiple children. > @@ -4839,14 +4892,17 @@ constructor must run these steps: <li><p>Set <var>request</var>'s Newline due to multiple children again. > @@ -4839,14 +4892,17 @@ constructor must run these steps: <li><p>Set <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>referrer policy</a> to the empty string. + <p class=note>This is done to ensure that when a service worker "redirects" a request, .e.g., No dot before e.g. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/560#pullrequestreview-47216505
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 18:46:58 UTC