Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151)

jugglinmike commented on this pull request.



> +          </li>
+        </ol>
+      </li>
+      <li>Return false.
+    </ol>
+  </div>
+
+  <section>
+    <h3 id="grant-command">
+      Grant
+    </h3>
+    <table>
+      <tbody>
+        <tr>
+          <th>HTTP Method</th>
+          <th><a lt="extension command prefix">Prefix</a></th>

Some of the text is definitely slanted towards vendor-specific extensions, but the use case for web standards is more clear in [the "Extensions" sub-section of "Design Notes"](https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/webdriver-spec.html#extensions):

> WebDriver aims to allow other standards to provide extensions to support new
> functionality, and to allow conformance tests that cannot be implemented
> entirely in ECMAScript to be written in a vendor-neutral way. 

I was also a little confused about URL/URI specification while writing this. Earlier today, I opened a couple pull requests that I hope will clear things up a bit:

- https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/pull/952
- https://github.com/w3c/webdriver/pull/953

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/151#discussion_r123123181