Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider Client behavior for windows where initial about:blank is replaced with a loaded document (#1091)

Or maybe this all suggests we should avoid exposing reserved Clients at all.  Its pretty complicated and perhaps not worth the hassle.

@jakearchibald, can you refresh my memory as to why we needed reserved Client ID?  Can we get the same thing another way without actually referencing not-quite-there-yet Clients?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1091#issuecomment-309776574