Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Share API (#179)

Apologies for the delayed reply. Last week's call was cancelled due to low participation, so I didn't have time to discuss this further with the group.

> I left the paragraph in the spec because other user agents may feel differently about explicitly warning the user. I guess if you want the spec to reflect the opinion of Google, we would either take this paragraph out, or change it to a SHOULD NOT. But it seems like something for an implementor to consider, and we don't have a particularly strong reason not to show an additional warning in this case. What would you recommend?

Since the share() logic in the normative text suggests that the user must be presented with a chooser dialog, I gave it some extra thought and I don't think the additional warning isn't needed. (If any OS comes up with a OS level private mode, we might need to add some extra notes there - but we can deal with that when there is a OS that does this. I have my doubts. :-))

The changes against the URL field look good to me, but I'll discuss this in this week's call so we can move forward on this. If you have any large changes that may need a second round of review at any point in the development cycle we'd be more than glad to sit down and review the changes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/179#issuecomment-309644761