- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:37:12 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 16 June 2017 17:37:49 UTC
Also note that allowing subscripting `a[12].c` syntax would likely be more readable. We'd want to compose that with the proposal in https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/35 though, where empty `[]` means "iterate" to allow e.g. `a[].id` to collect the `id` fields of all `a`s; would `a[].id[12]` be supported? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/209#issuecomment-309088080
Received on Friday, 16 June 2017 17:37:49 UTC