Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update the “Link type "serviceworker"” section (#1110)

domenic commented on this pull request.



>  
   <section>
-    <h3 id="link-header-processing">Processing the <code>Link</code> header</h3>
+    <h3 id="serviceworker-link-header">Declaring a "serviceworker" <code>Link</code> header</h3>
+
+    A <a>serviceworker link</a> can be declared using a `Link` header</a> [[!RFC5988]] with "`serviceworker`" as the value of the "`rel`" parameter and a [=service worker/script url=] as the <a>target IRI</a>, and the following optional <a>target attributes</a>:
+
+    : `scope`
+    :: Value: A [=service worker registration/scope url=].

I think it's better not to reference obsoleted concepts like URI. Instead I'd do ", serialized", linking to https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-serializer (so I think that's `[=URL serializer|serialized=]`).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1110#discussion_r122037640