Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update the “Link type "serviceworker"” section (#1110)

jungkees commented on this pull request.



>  
   <section>
-    <h3 id="link-header-processing">Processing the <code>Link</code> header</h3>
+    <h3 id="serviceworker-link-header">Declaring a "serviceworker" <code>Link</code> header</h3>
+
+    A <a>serviceworker link</a> can be declared using a `Link` header</a> [[!RFC5988]] with "`serviceworker`" as the value of the "`rel`" parameter and a [=service worker/script url=] as the <a>target IRI</a>, and the following optional <a>target attributes</a>:
+
+    : `scope`
+    :: Value: A [=service worker registration/scope url=].

@sideshowbarker, checking https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-5, I think we can just say ":: Value: A [=service worker registration/scope url=] as a URI-Reference" or something like that. WDYT?

And for the script url above, "a [=service worker/script url=] as a URI-Reference inside angle brackets ("<>")" seems clearer I guess. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1110#discussion_r121857361