- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:35 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 07:01:10 UTC
jungkees commented on this pull request. > <section> - <h3 id="link-header-processing">Processing the <code>Link</code> header</h3> + <h3 id="serviceworker-link-header">Declaring a "serviceworker" <code>Link</code> header</h3> + + A <a>serviceworker link</a> can be declared using a `Link` header</a> [[!RFC5988]] with "`serviceworker`" as the value of the "`rel`" parameter and a [=service worker/script url=] as the <a>target IRI</a>, and the following optional <a>target attributes</a>: + + : `scope` + :: Value: A [=service worker registration/scope url=]. I'm not sure but would like to check if some serialized url should be used for this? scope url is a URL record. Can @annevk help? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1110#pullrequestreview-43358415
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 07:01:10 UTC