- From: Gordon P. Hemsley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:49:07 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 04:49:42 UTC
Ah, OK, I follow now. Although _codePoint_ is just the name of the variable; there is nothing self-evident about its type other than human intuition. It should say "code point _codePoint_". Also, is there a reason these steps are not explicitly using another variable to keep track of the output? It seems unnecessarily convoluted to implicitly keep track of "the results concatenated". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/296#issuecomment-307689232
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 04:49:42 UTC