- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 07:01:41 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 14:02:26 UTC
We're confused that the service worker spec and the HTML spec seem to have contradicting definitions of updateViaCache in HTMLLinkElement.
(SW spec)
```
partial interface HTMLLinkElement {
...
[CEReactions] attribute ServiceWorkerUpdateViaCache updateViaCache;
};
```
(HTML spec)
```
interface HTMLLinkElement : HTMLElement {
...
[CEReactions] attribute DOMString updateViaCache;
};
```
It seems the HTMLLinkElement extension in the service worker spec is not needed since the HTML spec has it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1104#issuecomment-307397005
Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 14:02:26 UTC