Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should update() called on an installing worker reject (as currently does?) (#1155)

@delapuente, the first job queued and run will be popped from the queue when the job finishes. So, the second job should have been aggregated no matter whether the job queue was empty or not when the first job arrived. That is, the consecutive update() calls will always be aggregated. So, only one update occurs. (Note that, if other type of jobs (register or unregister) are queued in between, the latter update jobs are queued.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1155#issuecomment-307323588