Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204)

That's a 400 rather than a 404/410 which is a bit weird.

FWIW I'm still not convinced we made the right choice here, and would be happy to make 404/410 unregister.

I get that this may potentially trigger some false positives in event of a server glitch (https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/204#issuecomment-39613075), but I feel these situations are rarer than issues with orphaning service worker scripts as @wanderview describes.

@slightlyoff is your view here unchanged?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/204#issuecomment-307116621